Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(126,934 posts)
Fri May 23, 2025, 05:37 PM May 23

Karoline Leavitt for the loss:

OOPS: Karoline Leavitt said on record that Trump's meeting with top buyers of his crypto coin isn't buying influence because it's on his "personal time". But SCOTUS says he's only immune for his crimes during "official acts" – not personal ones. She F**KED him.

Ron Stonebear Shields (@stonebear4747.bsky.social) 2025-05-23T03:54:37.313Z
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Karoline Leavitt for the loss: (Original Post) applegrove May 23 OP
This is correct. Much nonsense is posted on DU as if a prez has no personal time Bernardo de La Paz May 23 #1
He told himself, as an official act, to go. It was an official act, he's free and clear again. These jerks don't dem4decades May 23 #2
He doesn't know anything about that JoseBalow May 23 #3
Right. He had no idea she was his press secretary on TV every day. Irish_Dem May 23 #4
Oopsie! surfered May 23 #5
*SNORT* Skittles May 23 #13
Lol.. I Posted down thread Cha May 23 #19
Even if not covered by immunity, what about the event was criminal? thesquanderer May 23 #6
Emoluments Clause? HighFired49 May 24 #21
violating the emoluments clause of the constitution carries is not criminal, per se. thesquanderer May 25 #26
She seems to be desperate Mr. Evil May 23 #7
I heard someone say Traildogbob May 23 #8
I'm surprised BonnieJW May 24 #23
Good one!!! Traildogbob May 24 #25
If it's a "personal act," then why was the Presidental Seal on the podium? LastLiberal in PalmSprings May 23 #9
I wish a reporter would ask her.... IjustDontlikeRepugs May 23 #10
Oh, KKKaroline, NO! BurnDoubt May 23 #11
Are his shit-house rants Official Duty (?), or "Personal Time"? BurnDoubt May 23 #12
When asked about all the tacky shit in the Oval Office Leavitt said, "It's the Golden Office for the Golden Age." sop May 23 #14
Oh wow! Great point! Dem4life1970 May 23 #15
BlueSky post erronis May 23 #16
GOOD CATCH. KentuckyWoman May 23 #17
Plastic barbie bot. Cha May 23 #18
In more ways than one orangecrush May 23 #20
I truly despise this smug, arrogant little (expletive deleted) Dulcinea May 24 #22
Nattering Nabob czarjak May 24 #24

Bernardo de La Paz

(57,192 posts)
1. This is correct. Much nonsense is posted on DU as if a prez has no personal time
Fri May 23, 2025, 05:41 PM
May 23

Presidents are available for decision making 24/7/365 but they are not performing "Official Duties" while showering, golfing, changing diaper, or sleeping.

dem4decades

(12,984 posts)
2. He told himself, as an official act, to go. It was an official act, he's free and clear again. These jerks don't
Fri May 23, 2025, 05:41 PM
May 23

give a shit if anything is true or not, they just press on. Who's going to stop them?

Irish_Dem

(72,509 posts)
4. Right. He had no idea she was his press secretary on TV every day.
Fri May 23, 2025, 05:59 PM
May 23

He has no idea who gave her that job.

thesquanderer

(12,687 posts)
6. Even if not covered by immunity, what about the event was criminal?
Fri May 23, 2025, 06:37 PM
May 23

People/companies "buy influence" all the time. Unless you can connect it to a specific quid pro quo, it's hard to prove criminal bribery.

HighFired49

(424 posts)
21. Emoluments Clause?
Sat May 24, 2025, 01:03 PM
May 24

Are there any foreign investors in his crypto scam? Did he place his businesses someone else's control when he took office this time? I guess the new "thinking" goes "well he didn't do it in his first term, so we'll let him get away with it again." This is just another in your face, blatant act of corruption. Impeach him, already!!

thesquanderer

(12,687 posts)
26. violating the emoluments clause of the constitution carries is not criminal, per se.
Sun May 25, 2025, 12:09 AM
May 25

It's unconstitutional (and could be grounds for impeachment, e.g. he swore an oath to uphold the constitution), but there is no corresponding law, e.g .nothing specifying it as a misdemeanor or felony, nothing indicating what the penalty would be, etc. Congress could pass such a law, but as of now, none exists.

This article may be of interest: https://www.justsecurity.org/73148/good-governance-paper-no-15-enforcing-the-emoluments-clauses/

Mr. Evil

(3,353 posts)
7. She seems to be desperate
Fri May 23, 2025, 06:38 PM
May 23

in making that old trope 'the dumb blonde' true as can be.

She can't possibly be that incredibly dumb. Or...?

Traildogbob

(11,518 posts)
25. Good one!!!
Sat May 24, 2025, 04:15 PM
May 24

That should be mandated to wear one.
Her’s would be a danger to press people that freak out or stroke from flashing lights. Welding glasses would be needed.
It is pathetic how easy she does it, knowing she lies and raging when called out.
Her first day she spewed the biggest lie.
“I will never lie to you”.

9. If it's a "personal act," then why was the Presidental Seal on the podium?
Fri May 23, 2025, 06:55 PM
May 23

Inquiring minds want to know.

sop

(15,238 posts)
14. When asked about all the tacky shit in the Oval Office Leavitt said, "It's the Golden Office for the Golden Age."
Fri May 23, 2025, 07:28 PM
May 23

Dem4life1970

(938 posts)
15. Oh wow! Great point!
Fri May 23, 2025, 07:57 PM
May 23

I wonder if the SCOTUS justices who voted for the "official acts" nonsense wishes they had a do over on that vote.

Dulcinea

(8,775 posts)
22. I truly despise this smug, arrogant little (expletive deleted)
Sat May 24, 2025, 02:09 PM
May 24

It would give me great pleasure to give her a swirly in full view of the WH press corps.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Karoline Leavitt for the ...