General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKaroline Leavitt for the loss:
OOPS: Karoline Leavitt said on record that Trump's meeting with top buyers of his crypto coin isn't buying influence because it's on his "personal time". But SCOTUS says he's only immune for his crimes during "official acts" â not personal ones. She F**KED him.
— Ron Stonebear Shields (@stonebear4747.bsky.social) 2025-05-23T03:54:37.313Z

Bernardo de La Paz
(57,192 posts)Presidents are available for decision making 24/7/365 but they are not performing "Official Duties" while showering, golfing, changing diaper, or sleeping.
dem4decades
(12,984 posts)give a shit if anything is true or not, they just press on. Who's going to stop them?
JoseBalow
(7,963 posts)
Irish_Dem
(72,509 posts)He has no idea who gave her that job.
surfered
(8,014 posts)

Cha
(313,103 posts)before I read yours. Just looking at the OP pic made me do it.
TY!
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=20339734
thesquanderer
(12,687 posts)People/companies "buy influence" all the time. Unless you can connect it to a specific quid pro quo, it's hard to prove criminal bribery.
HighFired49
(424 posts)Are there any foreign investors in his crypto scam? Did he place his businesses someone else's control when he took office this time? I guess the new "thinking" goes "well he didn't do it in his first term, so we'll let him get away with it again." This is just another in your face, blatant act of corruption. Impeach him, already!!
thesquanderer
(12,687 posts)It's unconstitutional (and could be grounds for impeachment, e.g. he swore an oath to uphold the constitution), but there is no corresponding law, e.g .nothing specifying it as a misdemeanor or felony, nothing indicating what the penalty would be, etc. Congress could pass such a law, but as of now, none exists.
This article may be of interest: https://www.justsecurity.org/73148/good-governance-paper-no-15-enforcing-the-emoluments-clauses/
Mr. Evil
(3,353 posts)in making that old trope 'the dumb blonde' true as can be.
She can't possibly be that incredibly dumb. Or...?
Traildogbob
(11,518 posts)She can lie with passionate rage. With the cross in full view always.
BonnieJW
(2,977 posts)her cross doesn't have flashing lights
Traildogbob
(11,518 posts)That should be mandated to wear one.
Hers would be a danger to press people that freak out or stroke from flashing lights. Welding glasses would be needed.
It is pathetic how easy she does it, knowing she lies and raging when called out.
Her first day she spewed the biggest lie.
I will never lie to you.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(13,214 posts)Inquiring minds want to know.
IjustDontlikeRepugs
(732 posts)Why do you dye your roots black?
BurnDoubt
(831 posts)BurnDoubt
(831 posts)InQuiring Minds want to know.
sop
(15,238 posts)Dem4life1970
(938 posts)I wonder if the SCOTUS justices who voted for the "official acts" nonsense wishes they had a do over on that vote.
erronis
(20,662 posts)
KentuckyWoman
(7,140 posts)Cha
(313,103 posts)

orangecrush
(25,736 posts)Dulcinea
(8,775 posts)It would give me great pleasure to give her a swirly in full view of the WH press corps.
czarjak
(13,017 posts)Spiro knew?