Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(126,139 posts)
Fri May 23, 2025, 05:37 PM Friday

Karoline Leavitt for the loss:

OOPS: Karoline Leavitt said on record that Trump's meeting with top buyers of his crypto coin isn't buying influence because it's on his "personal time". But SCOTUS says he's only immune for his crimes during "official acts" – not personal ones. She F**KED him.

Ron Stonebear Shields (@stonebear4747.bsky.social) 2025-05-23T03:54:37.313Z
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Karoline Leavitt for the loss: (Original Post) applegrove Friday OP
This is correct. Much nonsense is posted on DU as if a prez has no personal time Bernardo de La Paz Friday #1
He told himself, as an official act, to go. It was an official act, he's free and clear again. These jerks don't dem4decades Friday #2
He doesn't know anything about that JoseBalow Friday #3
Right. He had no idea she was his press secretary on TV every day. Irish_Dem Friday #4
Oopsie! surfered Friday #5
*SNORT* Skittles Friday #13
Lol.. I Posted down thread Cha Friday #19
Even if not covered by immunity, what about the event was criminal? thesquanderer Friday #6
Emoluments Clause? HighFired49 Saturday #21
violating the emoluments clause of the constitution carries is not criminal, per se. thesquanderer Sunday #26
She seems to be desperate Mr. Evil Friday #7
I heard someone say Traildogbob Friday #8
I'm surprised BonnieJW Saturday #23
Good one!!! Traildogbob Saturday #25
If it's a "personal act," then why was the Presidental Seal on the podium? LastLiberal in PalmSprings Friday #9
I wish a reporter would ask her.... IjustDontlikeRepugs Friday #10
Oh, KKKaroline, NO! BurnDoubt Friday #11
Are his shit-house rants Official Duty (?), or "Personal Time"? BurnDoubt Friday #12
When asked about all the tacky shit in the Oval Office Leavitt said, "It's the Golden Office for the Golden Age." sop Friday #14
Oh wow! Great point! Dem4life1970 Friday #15
BlueSky post erronis Friday #16
GOOD CATCH. KentuckyWoman Friday #17
Plastic barbie bot. Cha Friday #18
In more ways than one orangecrush Friday #20
I truly despise this smug, arrogant little (expletive deleted) Dulcinea Saturday #22
Nattering Nabob czarjak Saturday #24

Bernardo de La Paz

(55,991 posts)
1. This is correct. Much nonsense is posted on DU as if a prez has no personal time
Fri May 23, 2025, 05:41 PM
Friday

Presidents are available for decision making 24/7/365 but they are not performing "Official Duties" while showering, golfing, changing diaper, or sleeping.

dem4decades

(12,798 posts)
2. He told himself, as an official act, to go. It was an official act, he's free and clear again. These jerks don't
Fri May 23, 2025, 05:41 PM
Friday

give a shit if anything is true or not, they just press on. Who's going to stop them?

Irish_Dem

(69,973 posts)
4. Right. He had no idea she was his press secretary on TV every day.
Fri May 23, 2025, 05:59 PM
Friday

He has no idea who gave her that job.

thesquanderer

(12,614 posts)
6. Even if not covered by immunity, what about the event was criminal?
Fri May 23, 2025, 06:37 PM
Friday

People/companies "buy influence" all the time. Unless you can connect it to a specific quid pro quo, it's hard to prove criminal bribery.

HighFired49

(413 posts)
21. Emoluments Clause?
Sat May 24, 2025, 01:03 PM
Saturday

Are there any foreign investors in his crypto scam? Did he place his businesses someone else's control when he took office this time? I guess the new "thinking" goes "well he didn't do it in his first term, so we'll let him get away with it again." This is just another in your face, blatant act of corruption. Impeach him, already!!

thesquanderer

(12,614 posts)
26. violating the emoluments clause of the constitution carries is not criminal, per se.
Sun May 25, 2025, 12:09 AM
Sunday

It's unconstitutional (and could be grounds for impeachment, e.g. he swore an oath to uphold the constitution), but there is no corresponding law, e.g .nothing specifying it as a misdemeanor or felony, nothing indicating what the penalty would be, etc. Congress could pass such a law, but as of now, none exists.

This article may be of interest: https://www.justsecurity.org/73148/good-governance-paper-no-15-enforcing-the-emoluments-clauses/

Mr. Evil

(3,296 posts)
7. She seems to be desperate
Fri May 23, 2025, 06:38 PM
Friday

in making that old trope 'the dumb blonde' true as can be.

She can't possibly be that incredibly dumb. Or...?

Traildogbob

(11,224 posts)
25. Good one!!!
Sat May 24, 2025, 04:15 PM
Saturday

That should be mandated to wear one.
Her’s would be a danger to press people that freak out or stroke from flashing lights. Welding glasses would be needed.
It is pathetic how easy she does it, knowing she lies and raging when called out.
Her first day she spewed the biggest lie.
“I will never lie to you”.

9. If it's a "personal act," then why was the Presidental Seal on the podium?
Fri May 23, 2025, 06:55 PM
Friday

Inquiring minds want to know.

sop

(14,373 posts)
14. When asked about all the tacky shit in the Oval Office Leavitt said, "It's the Golden Office for the Golden Age."
Fri May 23, 2025, 07:28 PM
Friday

Dem4life1970

(871 posts)
15. Oh wow! Great point!
Fri May 23, 2025, 07:57 PM
Friday

I wonder if the SCOTUS justices who voted for the "official acts" nonsense wishes they had a do over on that vote.

Dulcinea

(8,423 posts)
22. I truly despise this smug, arrogant little (expletive deleted)
Sat May 24, 2025, 02:09 PM
Saturday

It would give me great pleasure to give her a swirly in full view of the WH press corps.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Karoline Leavitt for the ...