Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(126,489 posts)
Fri May 23, 2025, 03:09 PM May 23

U.S. Senate vote to nix California tailpipe emissions standard blocks 17 other states

The U.S. Senate voted early Thursday to prevent California from enforcing regulations on tailpipe emission from new cars and trucks, upending state regulations for the nearly 40% of Americans whose states follow California standards.

The House has already passed an identical measure, meaning the Senate vote sends the resolution to President Donald Trump’s desk.

The 51-46 vote, with Michigan Democrat Elissa Slotkin joining all Republicans present to vote in favor, cleared a Congressional Review Act resolution repealing Environmental Protection Agency waivers that allow California to set regulations for emissions from cars and light-duty trucks.

-snip-

Democrats blasted the near-party-line vote for contradicting the Senate parliamentarian, who’d ruled the waiver that the EPA had granted to California to set its own tailpipe standards was not a regulation that could be rolled back under the Congressional Review Act, or CRA.

https://washingtonstatestandard.com/2025/05/22/repub/u-s-senate-vote-to-nix-california-tailpipe-emissions-standard-blocks-17-other-states/

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Senate vote to nix California tailpipe emissions standard blocks 17 other states (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 23 OP
Fuck you, MAGA pieces of shit. Basso8vb May 23 #1
Let's cut health care and increase smog Johonny May 23 #2
No consequences for the billionaires RandomNumbers May 23 #11
Howcum when the Rethugs were the minority PCIntern May 23 #3
Can we all do some markodochartaigh May 23 #4
I guess we will never here the phrase "State's Rights" coming from a Republican again. OAITW r.2.0 May 23 #5
It looks like CA is suing the feds fujiyamasan May 23 #6
I'd guess supremacy clause Igel May 23 #8
Killing Earth and People ASSHOLES. Cha May 23 #7
This will be a big states rights case Buckeyeblue May 23 #9
These people are mindless puppets. Do a search for photos of the smog that once choked us taxi May 23 #10
California needs then to impose a state surcharge on non-compliant vehicles. roamer65 May 23 #12
Remember when the Dems edhopper May 23 #13

Basso8vb

(1,202 posts)
1. Fuck you, MAGA pieces of shit.
Fri May 23, 2025, 03:11 PM
May 23

Our wrath will rain down upon you when this shit show is finally over.

Remember when these fucking assholes used to be all about "states rights?"

RandomNumbers

(18,784 posts)
11. No consequences for the billionaires
Fri May 23, 2025, 07:48 PM
May 23

in their ivory towers with high powered air filtration and every other comfort and protection that money can buy.

The rest of us, don't matter.

PCIntern

(27,506 posts)
3. Howcum when the Rethugs were the minority
Fri May 23, 2025, 03:17 PM
May 23

in the Senate, they blocked tons of legislation but when we are in the minority, everything passes quickly?

markodochartaigh

(3,443 posts)
4. Can we all do some
Fri May 23, 2025, 03:28 PM
May 23

Thoughts and Prayers™ for senators Mansion and Cinema. I remember how steadfast they were in their support for the parliamentarian even when she nixed some of President Biden's provisions such as the ones on immigration and the minimum wage. They must be apoplectic.

/s

OAITW r.2.0

(30,489 posts)
5. I guess we will never here the phrase "State's Rights" coming from a Republican again.
Fri May 23, 2025, 03:55 PM
May 23

Same with "Family Values"

fujiyamasan

(513 posts)
6. It looks like CA is suing the feds
Fri May 23, 2025, 04:37 PM
May 23

I wouldn’t be surprised if this makes its way to the SC.

Occasionally Roberts and Barrett cross over, but I’d assume the usual 6-3 ruling siding with the federal government. Any guess as to the reasoning? Interstate commerce clause? Curious how this will be decided.

Igel

(37,016 posts)
8. I'd guess supremacy clause
Fri May 23, 2025, 06:32 PM
May 23

The EPA issued a waiver that allowed California to impose stricter regulations than the Congress-authorized EPA issued.

To roll them back just requires revoking the waiver. Oddly, that's an executive action as permitted by Congress, yet the courts seem to be saying that the executive has no control over the waiver and others say that Congress doesn't.

Personally, that tells me that some subset of the executive branch functions as its own branch of government, and once set in motion is untrammeled by pesky notions of accountability, checks and balances, and democracy. Democracy gets a say--one time and that's it. Rather like there are "democracies" where a president/caudillo gets elected once and says, "I am elected as president" ... And 20 years later is still "elected as president." (Abbas comes to mind. So does Hamas, even if those elected are now dead and their replacements are in charge ... sort of.)

taxi

(2,411 posts)
10. These people are mindless puppets. Do a search for photos of the smog that once choked us
Fri May 23, 2025, 06:57 PM
May 23

not so pretty are the pictures that come up when typing
images 1960's smog
into your favorite search engine

roamer65

(37,681 posts)
12. California needs then to impose a state surcharge on non-compliant vehicles.
Fri May 23, 2025, 08:55 PM
May 23

100 pct of sticker price should do.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. Senate vote to nix C...