Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hidden in the Big Beautiful Bull**** Bill: (Original Post) applegrove May 22 OP
There is a caveat however. Disaffected May 22 #1
Can you help me find madamesilverspurs May 22 #2
Oh it's in there......ya know someplace within the gawd damn 1000 pages. a kennedy May 22 #4
Page 562, SEC. 70302. RESTRICTION OF FUNDS. Disaffected May 22 #5
HUGE thank you! madamesilverspurs May 22 #6
YW but you're going to read the whole thing?? Disaffected May 22 #7
I am thick when it comes to the detailed language applegrove May 22 #3

Disaffected

(5,785 posts)
1. There is a caveat however.
Thu May 22, 2025, 07:29 PM
May 22

If "security" is given by the plaintiff (to cover defendant's costs if the injunction or TRO is later overturned on appeal), then the injunction or TRO can be ordered (as I understand it). How much of an improvement that is in practice remains a question however.

Here's the text of the bill:

“No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued….”

a kennedy

(34,015 posts)
4. Oh it's in there......ya know someplace within the gawd damn 1000 pages.
Thu May 22, 2025, 08:16 PM
May 22

*pulling hair out* and so sorry. I just am so SICK AND GAWD DAMN TIRED OF THIS GAWD DAMN ADMINISTRATION. 🤬 🤬.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hidden in the Big Beautif...