Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

In It to Win It

(10,607 posts)
Thu May 22, 2025, 06:21 PM Thursday

Slotkin joins Senate Republicans in rejecting California ban of gas-powered cars

Congress has approved a resolution rejecting a waiver granted to California by former President Joe Biden's administration that would have allowed that state and possibly others to ban the sale of new gasoline-powered cars, trucks and sport-utility vehicles by 2035.

But the fight over whether Congress' decision to do so — or President Donald Trump's efforts to stop California in its effort to block the sale of vehicles with internal combustion engines as a means of reducing greenhouse gases — is legal, is just beginning.

"We intend to sue the Trump administration," California Attorney General Rob Bonta said at a news conference on May 22. "This is unprecedented."

Earlier in the day, the U.S. Senate voted 51-44 in favor of a resolution already passed in the House to turn back the Biden administration waiver granted to California by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) about a month before Biden left office this January. That waiver allows the state to move ahead with a program requiring an increasing share of new cars, trucks and SUVs sold to be zero emission or otherwise penalize automakers.

Both congressional chambers passed the resolution after Trump's new EPA head, Lee Zeldin, asked for a legislative review under a law — the Congressional Review Act, or CRA — that allows the House and Senate to reject some agency-finalized rules within 60 business days of their being notified.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/slotkin-joins-senate-republicans-rejecting-210302574.html
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Basso8vb

(991 posts)
1. I do NOT want to go back to the disgusting filthy air we had here in CA back in the 70s.
Thu May 22, 2025, 06:25 PM
Thursday

Fuck MAGA. 🖕

Celerity

(49,970 posts)
5. I warned about her here for years. No Labels Problem Solver is not a good 'label'. Look at Sinema for a perfect example.
Thu May 22, 2025, 06:46 PM
Thursday

MichMan

(15,181 posts)
6. Slotkin is representing her constituents in Michigan
Thu May 22, 2025, 06:58 PM
Thursday

A substantial number are employed in the auto industry (many unionized) which is a significant part of Michigan's economy. Consumers aren't ready to buy EV in the numbers required to meet the mandates. If they don't, the manufacturers are the ones that get penalized.

The most effective incentive to get people to replace their ICE powered vehicles with EV is make operating them much more expensive with higher gasoline prices. I know people don't like that, but to expect people to dump ICE vehicles when gas is relatively cheap isn't rational.

States that want to still encourage a transition to EV, could, on their own, increase their gas taxes by a couple dollars a gallon or more over time and still move towards meeting their EV goals.


MichMan

(15,181 posts)
9. Vermont just paused their mandate because it wasn't feasible
Thu May 22, 2025, 07:19 PM
Thursday

Governor Phil Scott Issues Executive Order to Pause Electric Vehicle Sales Requirements

“I continue to believe we should be incentivizing Vermonters to transition to cleaner energy options like electric vehicles. However, we have to be realistic about a pace that’s achievable. It’s clear we don’t have anywhere near enough charging infrastructure and insufficient technological advances in heavy-duty vehicles to meet current goals,” said Governor Scott. “We have much more work to do, in order make it more convenient, faster, and more affordable to buy, maintain and charge EV’s. When we do, it’s more likely everyday Vermonters will make the switch.”

Governor Scott remains committed to addressing climate change, including advocating for more charging infrastructure, which is key to supporting Vermonters in making EVs viable and reducing transportation emissions. When it comes to transitioning to a low-carbon future, mandates are not going to be the total answer. Using common sense and incentivizing technological advancements is necessary to overall success and this compliance flexibility is intended to reflect this reality.


https://governor.vermont.gov/press-release/governor-phil-scott-issues-executive-order-pause-electric-vehicle-sales-requirements

David__77

(24,156 posts)
10. It's fascinating to see a country so willfully sabotage itself.
Thu May 22, 2025, 07:29 PM
Thursday

Well… perhaps it will create space for others.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Slotkin joins Senate Repu...