General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAaron Parnas: BREAKING: Kristi Noem doesn't know what Habeas Corpus is.
BREAKING: Kristi Noem doesnât know what Habeas Corpus is.
— Aaron Parnas (@aaronparnas.bsky.social) 2025-05-20T14:26:25.688Z
This is highly concerning


Omnipresent
(6,898 posts)
Javaman
(63,868 posts)Aristus
(70,030 posts)anything.
Baitball Blogger
(50,043 posts)through a DEI system are dumber than rocks.
underpants
(190,794 posts)but hes seen them on TV or likes how they look.
Loyalty even fealty rules as you said.
mwmisses4289
(1,112 posts)C_U_L8R
(47,352 posts)What a dumbass.
hlthe2b
(109,894 posts)William Seger
(11,644 posts)Dave Bowman
(5,196 posts)riversedge
(75,684 posts)We knew a long time ago that Noem has sold her soul to Trump.
BREAKING: Kristi Noem, the head of DHS, has no f-cking clue what habeas corpus means.
We are living in the dumbest of times.
Noem: Habeas corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
muriel_volestrangler
(103,721 posts)Back in 1959, this was a satire of Twelve Angry Men. Now, it's One Stupid Woman.
hlthe2b
(109,894 posts)Obviously that in parentheses is mine.
Basso8vb
(991 posts)I highly doubt she even sat for her own bar exam.
She went to law school? OMFG!!!!
Not a lawyer.
leftieNanner
(15,966 posts)She barely finished college.
Not a lawyer.
usonian
(17,849 posts)
Disaffected
(5,592 posts)she not only does not know the actual definition but comes up with an absurd definition (which she may have actually believed or, pulled it out of her butt - who knows?).
Midnight Writer
(24,028 posts)The media has spoken.
IronLionZion
(48,911 posts)Ponietz
(3,742 posts)Charles the First found out the hard way.
mac56
(17,734 posts)GoodRaisin
(10,196 posts)lying, cheating, stealing, and hurting others. Shes a model Krasnovite.
Buddyzbuddy
(892 posts)
moniss
(7,326 posts)the person who killed her dog because she didn't want it anymore.
wcmagumba
(3,951 posts)The cray cray is strong in this one...(Obi Wan Kenobi)...
moniss
(7,326 posts)it's obvious they have an itch to pull the trigger.
Jerry2144
(2,849 posts)Or one of their quickie marts?
yonder
(10,074 posts)and we'll set you straight.
I'll see myself to the door
Jerry2144
(2,849 posts)Good pun. Thank you
dlk
(12,639 posts)She just doesnt care and has other plans
Moostache
(10,526 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(163,529 posts)The homeland security secretary was asked to define habeas corpus. Her outrageously wrong answer was humiliating but it was also important.
It's tempting to laugh at Kristi Noemâs humiliating ignorance about the meaning of habeas corpus, but this isnât just some embarrassing gaffe.
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-05-20T16:48:08.242Z
Given the scope of her powers, her cluelessness matters.
(And in a healthier environment, Noem would be forced to resign in embarrassment right about now.)
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/kristi-noem-flunks-important-test-basic-meaning-habeas-corpus-rcna207982
Take Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, for example. Axios reported:
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem botched questions about habeas corpus at a Senate hearing Tuesday, falsely asserting the check on the governments power to detain people actually gives President Trump a constitutional right to conduct deportations.
Theres been considerable discussion in recent weeks about basic legal principles such as habeas corpus and the degree to which the Trump administration is hostile toward the bedrock foundations of the American system of government. Whats gone largely overlooked, however, is whether Trump administration officials have a high-school-civics-class-level understanding of what these legal principles are.
Take Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, for example. Axios reported:
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem botched questions about habeas corpus at a Senate hearing Tuesday, falsely asserting the check on the governments power to detain people actually gives President Trump a constitutional right to conduct deportations.
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:4llrhdclvdlmmynkwsmg5tdc/post/3lpmbmmjkjk2i?ref_src=embed&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fiframe.nbcnews.com%252FM7Qndazh
Link to tweet
.....In case this werent quite enough, when Democratic Sen. Andy Kim of New Jersey asked the Cabinet secretary which part of the Constitution includes habeas corpus, Noem was again stumped.
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:4llrhdclvdlmmynkwsmg5tdc/post/3lpmdrjzm4k2i?ref_src=embed&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fiframe.nbcnews.com%252FlyrF0Vwh
Link to tweet
The significance of this goes well beyond marveling at a powerful officials ignorance. Earlier this month, Stephen Miller, a White House deputy chief of staff, told reporters that White House officials are actively looking at possibly suspending the writ of habeas corpus. If this were to happen, the Trump administration would have the power to lock people up without charges, and prisoners would not have the ability to contest their incarceration.
Eleven days after Miller made those comments, the homeland security secretary couldnt even offer a basic definition of what habeas corpus is despite the scope of her powers, and despite the fact that this legal principle has existed for the better part of a millennium.
In a healthier political environment, a fiasco such as this one would lead to credible discussion about whether Noem should be forced to resign in embarrassment.